NUESTRO TRABAJO

COMPARATIVO DE PEDIGREES ENTRE GANADORA PRIMERA PRUEBA TRIPLE CORONA EN BRASIL Y POTRILLO SELECCIONADO

Cristal: Linda Ude conquista a primeira prova da Tríplice Coroa de Éguas [19/02/2015]

Nessa tarde de quinta-feira, deram início as primeiras provas da Tríplice Coroa no Hipódromo do Cristal. No oitavo páreo do dia, o Grande Prêmio Estupenda - 1ª Prova da Tríplice Coroa de Éguas, disputada nos 1.600 metros da pista de areia, contou com a vitória da candidata  favorita Linda Ude.

Nos metros iniciais da prova, várias competidores saíram ligeiras e buscavam as primeiras posições. Linda Ude aproveitou o menor terreno e assumiu a liderança. Like It  Or Lump It secundou a ponteira. A briga era intensa nas posições seguintes. Linda Ude seguiu a galope na liderança até a entrada da última curva, onde Flight At Night começou a buscar melhor posição. Ao contornarem a curva e entrarem na reta final, Linda Ude entrou ao centro de pista dominando a prova, mas Flight At Night surgiu grudada na cerca interna e começou a se aproximar perigosamente da ponteira Linda Ude. A favorita Linda Ude sentiu aos ataques de Flight At Night, mas Lucas Conceição deu rédeas a sua conduzida que rapidamente deixou Flight At Night para trás. Linda Ude cruzou o disco na primeira posição e é a candidata a tríplice coroa. Flight At Night formou a dupla. Ellen Caliente, Wonder Machine e Delicious Chris, completaram o marcador.

Linda Ude é uma filha de Vetor e Soneca por First American de criação e propriedade do Stud Agenda. Ela chegou a sua quinta vitória em 10 saídas. Apresentada no último furo pelo treinador J.Tavares e conduzida na perfeita rédea de L.Conceição, Linda Ude registrou o tempo de 1m45s80 para a distância.

JOE CRUISE FUE SELECCIONADO EN BRASIL PARA UN HARAS DE URUGUAY

MI ANALISIS PERSONAL DE PARTE DE LA PRODUCCION DEL PADRILLO GALILEO

22,22% of the broodmares that produced Group 1 winners with GALILEO are from the female family 9. Undoubtedly it´s a high and uncommon average! It´s something that need a deep investigation, but as I´ve been saying it´s seems to exist an affinity between GALILEO and the female family 9, despite the major portion of breeders considers the female family numbers of Bruce Lowe an archaic system. I will try to show you that it´s a useful tool, having the fine perception and feeling to use it:



I tried to compare with another top stallions. In order to share information for example DUBAWI, in a progeny of 16 Group 1 winners, anybody of them belongs to female family 9.

Between the progeny of 16 Group 2 winners, only 2 belongs to female family 9.



DEEP IMPACT has in total 18 Group 1 winners and only 3 belongs to female family 9.



DANSILI has 0 too of the female family 9 from 18 Group 1 winners.



TAPIT has 14 Group 1 winners and only 1 belongs to female family 9. And in the group of his Group 2 winners of 11, only 2 belongs to female family 9.



We must be conscious that the female family 9 is first at the ranking of stakes classics at the United States for a lot of years, and due to her multiples sub-branches she is the most common at the first level at the races in the United States, so it´s very rare what TAPIT´s figures displays.



GALILEO – covered 158 broodmares from the female family 9 over 1844 mares covered in totally: 8,56% mares family 9



TAPIT – covered 73 broodmares from the female family 9 over 780 mares covered in totally: 9,36% mares family 9



DUBAWI – covered 58 broodmares from the female family 9 over 774 mares covered in totally: 7,49% mares family 9



DANSILI – covered 118 broodmares from the female family 9 over 118 mares covered in totally: 11,06% mares family 9



DEEP IMPACT – covered 24 broodmares from the female family 9 over 306 mares covered in totally: 7,84% mares family 9



Looking at the % there are two stallions (TAPIT & DANSILI) that covered more broodmares from the female family 9 than GALILEO, but they haven´t got more Group 1 winners from this family than GALILEO. And the small difference of % with the other two (DUBAWI & DEEP IMPACT) doesn´t reflects the great difference in the number of Group 1 winners too.